Thursday, October 04, 2007

Being Pelosi/Juggling/Language

(P1) Political

This guy, Darin Murphy, captures my view precisely
he recounts Nancy Pelosi's pathetically revealing
performance on
"The View."I feel betrayed by Pelosi
and her Democratic congress we elected to end the carnage.
This week, it further appears they can't even get medical
care for little kids!

Weak Has a Face, And It's Pelosi's

Posted October 3, 2007 01:59 PM (EST) - Huffington Post

If there was any doubt before, which there wasn't, it's gone now. Watching Nancy Pelosi on The View yesterday morning provided the final proof that the backbone of the House is only as strong as its speaker. Her body language said it all. There she sat in the center of the table, sandwiched between Elizabeth Hasselbeck and the "Is the world flat? I don't know" lady, looking anxious and devoid of stately confidence. She could barely look in the eyes of America's Favorite True Believer on her left, who immediately smelled fear and pounced on her prey. "If the violence in Iraq had gone up," she started in (I'm paraphrasing), "you would be insisting that the surge was a failure. Now that the reports say it's gone down drastically, aren't you willing to admit that the surge is a success?" So what does Pelosi do? Does she make like Bill Clinton versus Chris Wallace, lean into her face and retort "young lady, don't try that little conservative hit job on me. You obviously don't know fudged numbers when you see them"? No. Instead she looks somewhere in Hasselbeck's general direction and squeaks meekly, "But that's still a lot of deaths." (I'm not paraphrasing). She then quickly changes the subject as she spends the rest of the interview leaning away from Hasselbeck and focusing on the three women on her right, wishing to God they had sat her down beside Whoopi.

But that wouldn't have been any more comforting. Whoopi was on her ass, too, about how she and her fellow Dems had failed to stop President Bush's war effort or at least elevate the level of discourse and control the debate on, uh, anything. Pelosi was a nervous wreck by then, desperately trying to tape together an impression of some sort of goal Congress had reached, and offered nothing that had actually made its way into law.

Watching those uncomfortable minutes tick by, I couldn't help thinking, "Man, if this lady can't hold her own at a table full of gossiping hens who care more about the future of Britney's babies then that of their country, no wonder impeachment is off the goddamn table!"

Barbara Walters mercifully ended the proceedings, tidily wrapping up the interview with something like "Well, Democrat or Republican, it's not important. What matters is that you're the first woman speaker of the House, and that means a lot!"

Um, no it doesn't, sorry. It doesn't mean dick when we're gonna spend a generation cleaning up after a disastrous eight-year siege of our country that no one in power has the guts to end. Madame Speaker is no different than her Senate counterpart. Reid and Pelosi are two distinguished minority leaders promoted to their level of incompetence by a frustrated electorate. Neither of them is yet able to energize their parties into accomplishing anything they were elected to do, hence their dismal poll numbers and an unfazed president who will smirk and coast his way to blissful retirement.

Comment Here on any of the above or below and read the comments of others too. Log in as "Other" if you like, but please be sure to sign some facsimile of your name. Or email me at

(P2) Poetical


A juggler seeking rest
must never begin

A juggler juggling
rests juggling
never seeking.

© Ed Coletti 2007

Comment Here on any of the above or below and read the comments of others too. Log in as "Other" if you like, but please be sure to sign some facsimile of your name. Or email me at

(P3) Philosophical

"Everything about our private and collective systems of meaning is bound up with language—and we don't have a clue about its origins. This may mean ultimately that we don't have a clue about ourselves either."-Sven Birkerts in The Electric Life

Comment Here on any of the above or below and read the comments of others too. Log in as "Other" if you like, but please be sure to sign some facsimile of your name. Or email me at


Bob said...

Medical care for 'little kids' is a joke when you realize the program includes 'kids' up to 28 years old.

Duncan said...

This guy, Murphy, is sort of right. Definitely right on Pelosi. Perhaps in their euphoria of November, 2006, the Democrats failed to notice most conservatives snickering, if not guffawing, when she was made Speaker. In the vernacular, weak suck, seems to fit. That goes for Reid, too.

Also, where are Boxer and Feinstein? And my hometown friend and Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Ike Skelton, had first shot at Gen. Petraus and I thought he was going to give him a hug!

But, on the issue of passing laws, what did the Dems expect? When the elephants were in power they bulldozed through that 60%-vote-to-pass nonsense, so if you (the mules) have only a one vote majority what the hell do you expect to get passed? Nada. More lol from the right.

What's obvious to me is that the Democrats have a creaky, weak, rusting machine, while the Republicans are driving a luxurious, high speed Abrams tank. The Dems have no "dark side" resources to ferret out the truth behind what's happening in Iraq, in our military, in our CIA, or FBI, our Justice Dept. or, most importantly, our Presidency. Not even a Deep Throat. The fact that the vice-president of the US can defacto run this country unimpeded is proof to me that the Democratic party is all but finished. Nixon's vision of the perpetual conservative governemt is getting closer to reality.

Hilary or Barrack won't make a spit of difference. I hope I'm wrong.

Duncan said...

Birkerts seems to be tippy toeing around what I have taken for fact for years. We don't have a clue about ourselves, where we came from, who or what we are, or where we are going. As he points out, we keep using language to try to find these answers.

One learns nothing while speaking. Only while listening. And one learns most while listening to one's self.